{"id":3230,"date":"2022-01-09T14:36:37","date_gmt":"2022-01-09T14:36:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/intelligenceanalyst.net\/?p=3230"},"modified":"2022-01-09T14:40:38","modified_gmt":"2022-01-09T14:40:38","slug":"2-introduction-to-economics-what-is-economics-and-why-is-it-significant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/2022\/01\/09\/2-introduction-to-economics-what-is-economics-and-why-is-it-significant\/","title":{"rendered":"2. Introduction to Microeconomics – What is Economics and Why is it Significant?"},"content":{"rendered":"Reading Time: <\/span> 10<\/span> minutes<\/span><\/span>\n

THE GOALS OF LEARNING<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

By the time we reach the end of this segment, you will acquire the ability to conversate about the significance of\nresearching and studying the field of economics, examine and articulate the connection between production and the\ndivision of labor, and assess the impact of scarcity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Economics can be described as the study of how humans make choices with scarcity as the primary condition. These can\nbe choices made by individual persons, as a family unit, by a business or by society as a whole. If you examine with\nfeverous squinting your surrounding environment, you will realize that scarcity is a major facet of reality.\nScarcity can be defined as the situation where human wants for goods, services and resources, are more than what\nis around at the time. The resources needed to produce the goods and services humans want are things such as labor,\ntools, land, raw materials and capital, yet they are limited in their supply. At the end of the day, the most scarce\nresource we have is time, whether a person is rich or poor, only has 24 hours in a single day to attempt to acquire\nthe goods and services they are seeking. At any time, it’s safe to say that our resources are finite.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One way to think about it is this: In 2015, the labor force of the United States of America consisted of over 158.6\nmillion workers, as per the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. It’s also worth noting that the total area of the\nUnited States is 3,794,101 square miles. These are quite the hefty numbers for such important resources, but the fact\nstill remains that they are rather limited. Due to the fact that these resources are limited, it’s also safe to ascertain\nthe unfortunate assumption that goods and services that can be produced with them is also limited. If you put this in\ncombination with the notion that human wants appear to be infinite, scarcity as a problem becomes more apparent and\nidentifiable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The homelessness epidemic, for example, is one way to prove scarcity exists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you don’t think scarcity is actually that significant, consider the following economic problem: Does every human being\non the planet need to eat food in order to survive? Does everyone need shelter in order to survive? Is everyone able\nto attain healthcare if they needed it? In every single country on the planet, there are those who are hungry, homeless,\nand need healthcare as soon as possible in order to survive, but simply do not have access to it. The most rational\nlabel that can be attributed to these scenarios in the economic sense is scarcity. Scarcity is to economics as a\nconcept what underwear is to a buttocks, therefore we need to examine scarcity a bit further in order to be able\nto understand economics better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

THE ISSUE OF SCARCITY<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you consider all the things that are the focus of our consumption, such as food, water, healthcare, electricity,\nshelter, clothing, transportation and entertainment, then how would you go about acquiring those items? Chances\nare that you don’t manufacture them yourself. More than likely you go out and buy them. How are you able to afford\nthe things that you buy? You work in exchange for getting paid. In case you don’t work, chances are someone else \nis working and getting paid to help you survive. Yet despite this, the vast majority of the human population never\nhas enough money to spend in order to acquire all the things they want. This is all too common of an issue arising\nout of this concept of scarcity. So how do we go about finding a solution?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every level of every society must determine the appropriate ways in which to utilize their own resources. A family\nmust determine whether it’s best to buy a new car or spend that money on a vacation instead. Towns must decide\nbetween allocating a greater portion of it’s budget to police and fire protection or the educational system.\nCountries must choose between allocating a greater budget for armed defense or for the purposes of ecological\nprotection. Most of the time, there is simply not enough money in the entire budget in order to allocate financial\nresources to everything in order to accomplish every single goal. So why don’t we just manufacture the things that\nwe consume ourselves? The most simple answer to this question is that most of us do not know how to manufacture these\nthings, but it is not the only answer that factors in here. With the study of economics you will learn things such as\nthe fact that the most obvious choice is not always the right answer, or at the very least, the complete answer. \nBy studying economics, you will begin to think and perceive the world in new ways. If you think back to the time\nof the pioneers, you will realize that people knew how to perform many more tasks than we do today, from building their\nown houses to growing their own crops, to hunting for food, as well as to repairing their equipment. The majority of\nhuman beings now do not know how to execute some of these tasks, and some of us don’t know how to do any of them!\nThis is not due to the fact that we cannot learn these things, or have lost our capacity to do so, but instead it\nhas become so we don’t have to. Adam Smith in his book The Wealth of Nations pioneered this idea through his defining\nof the division and specialization of labor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

THE DIVISION OF LABOR AND SPECIALIZATION OF LABOR ROLES<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Economics as a formal study has it’s roots with Adan Smith who lived from 1723 to 1790, and whom published his legendary\ntreatise on economics titled The Wealth of Nations, in the year 1776. There had been many authors who had written about\nthe subject of economics in the centuries prior to Smith, but he was the first to write on the subject in a more\nextensive manner. In the first chapter of the Wealth of Nations, Smith presents the concept of the division of labor,\nwhich essentially proposed that a good or service being produced can be divided into a variance of tasks produced by\ndifferent workers, as opposed to all tasks required to produce that good or service being carried out by a single\nworker. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In order to paint a better picture of the division of labor, Smith counted the number of tasks that were required to\nmake a pin: drawing out a piece of wire, cutting it to the correct length, placing a head on one end and a point on\nthe other, then packaging the pins, just to name some of the tasks included in this process. Smith counted 18 distinct\ntasks that were required to build a single pin! <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Businesses in contemporary times also divide tasks. Even a somewhat simple business such as that of a restaurant divides\nup the tasks regarding the cooking of meals between several different roles such as top chef, sous chefs, kitchen\nassistants, dishwashers, servers to be waiters for the tables, greeters to meet people at the door and find them seating,\njanitors to clean up everyone’s mess, as well as a manager to deal with everyone’s paychecks and bills, and this is\nnot to exclude the economic connections a restaurant keeps with it’s suppliers of food, furniture, kitchen equipment\nas well as the landlords that own the building where the restaurant happens to be. A more sophisticated business such\nas that of a manufacturing enterprise, such as that of a shoe factory, or something like a hospital, might consist\nof hundreds of job classifications working within it’s corridors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

HOW DOES THE DIVISION OF LABOR HELP TO INCREASE PRODUCTION?\n<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If we took the tasks required to produce a good or service and divided and sub-divided them among different workers\ntasked with different roles, we are able to get these workers as well as the industry to produce a greater output than\nthey normally would have if the workers took on all tasks individually and simultaneously. In the research for his\nbook, Smith observed workers in pin factories produce 20 pins per day when tasked with all the tasks required in\nproducing them, yet a small business of 10 workers, each tasked with only repeating 2-3 tasks out of the total 18\nrequired to produce a pin, the production output increased to 48,000 per day, which, is 240x more than if each of\nthose 10 workers was tasked with doing 20 tasks instead. So we need to examine how is it that, a group of workers\neach performing their own set of specialized tasks, is able to out-produce the group who is trained to perform all\ntasks required in the process to produce a pin? Smith suggested three reasons for this phenomena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first reason is a worker is afforded concentration focus in an area that they have some advantage in, and specialize\naccordingly to build on top of that strength as opposed to where they might have a weakness with a partiular task in\nthe production process. Later on in these series of articles, we will build on this idea by discussing the concept of\ncomparative advantage. People appear to have various skills, talents and interests, so they will be naturally more\nsuited and productive at some jobs and tasks over others. These particular advantages may arise out of previous\neducational experience, which are additionally molded by interests and talents. It is only those who possess degrees\nin medicine that qualify to become doctors, to give you one example. For certain goods, specialization relies on\nfactors such as geography – it is easier to become a wheat farmer in a place such as North Dakota over that of Florida,\nand yet it would be easier to operate a tourist hotel in Florida than in North Dakota. Likewise, if you live closer\nto a large city it would be easier to entice a sufficient quantity of customers to come to your dry cleaning business\nor movie theater than if you were located in a sparsely populated rural area that did not have a sufficient population\nthat would convert a large enough portion to sustain this business. Therefore, if people lean towards specializing in\nthings they know how to do best, they will gain greater efficacy in their productive abilities, than if they were\nto combine their knowledge to produce things they are both good at as well as not so good at.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second reason is that workers who specialize in fewer tasks will learn to produce something faster and with higher\nquality than if they spread out their efforts over more tasks. This pattern is apparent for most workers, and includes\nworkers such as those who work on the assembly line piecing together cars, barbers and stylists who cut hair, and\ncardiosurgeons who perform open heart surgery. It’s also proven that specialized workers know their skill well enough\nthat they can come up with innovative ways to improve upon their worker so it is faster and better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A kindred pattern can be observed in businesses. In many cases, a business that focuses on one or a handful of products,\nwhich is often referred to as the business’s core competency, ends up having higher rates of success than businesses\nwho attempt to sell a wider assortment of products. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The third reason is that economies of scale can be to the advantage of businesses via specialization in that with\nthe increasing number of a certain good being produced, the cost to produce eacn individual unit tends to decline.\nTo illustrate this, imagine a car factory that produces only 100 cars per year. Each car would be relatively expensive\nto produce. Yet, if a factory produces 50,000 cars per year, then it’s worth the factory’s investment to set up\nassembly lines and buy enormous machines that workers will use to perform specialized tasks, the average cost to\nproduce each individual car will significantly diminish. The results derived from workers who perform specialized\ntasks and can concentrate on their talents and preferences, perfect their specialized tasks, and work in large\norganizations in a society that would benefit more from the specialization and distribution of labor in such a way\nthat is more efficient and results in faster production output than if each person attempted to produce their own\ngoods and services. The division and specialization of labor has truly been a remarkable paradigm shift to curbing\nscarcity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TRADE AND MARKETS<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Specialization is obviously only rational if employees who are paid for doing these specialized tasks are able to pay\nfor other goods and services that they do not produce themselves. Simplified, in order for specialization to work,\nthe main requirement is trade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You do not need to have prior knowledge of electrical engineering or acoustic systems in order to know how to play music,\nyou can just buy an MP3 player, download the music and listen to it on the MP3 player. You don’t need to have a full\nbreadth of knowledge regarding artificial fibers or how sewing machines are constructed if you want to buy an article\nof clothing such as a skirt or a t-shirt, you simply go out and buy the skirt and wear it. You also do not need to be\na mechanical engineer or know the intricacies of an internal combustion engine in order to operate an automobile –\nyou just need to get inside the car and start driving. So instead of attempting to acquire all the knowledge, skills\nand abilities required for the manufacturing of all the goods and services that one would want to consume, \nthe market enables you to learn only a specialized set of skills and then use the pay that you receive for your own\nskills to buy the goods and services that you want or need to consume. This is the process through which our society\nhas developed a powerful economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

WHY SHOULD YOU STUDY ECONOMICS?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now since we’ve gone through a brief overview of what is typically studied in the field of economics, let’s now\nbriefly further convince you why you should study it. Economics should not be seen as a set of facts that should\nbe memorized, even though there lies a plethora of crucial ideas that need to be learned. Economics instead should be perceived\nas a compendium of questions that need answers or a series of puzzles that must be pieced together. Most crucially, economics\nwill give you the necessary knowledge and tools required in order to work these puzzles out. If you have not yet been bitten\nby the economics “bug”, there are several other reasons why you should begin studying the field of economics.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Basically every major issue that is plaguing the world today, ranging from global warming to world poverty, to the wars in Syria,\nAfghanistan and Somalia, contains an economic element. If you want to be involved in resolving these issues, you will need to be\nable to comprehend all the dimensions involved in them. Economics is one of these dimensions and having a thorough knowledge of\nthe subject is required for resolving these issues. <\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

– It is a bit difficult magnifying the crucial nature economics plays in terms of good citizenship. You need to possess the knowledge\nrequired for informed voting in regards to budgets, regulations, policies and laws that have societal implications. When the US\ngovernment came to a halt due to the fiscal cliff of 2012, what issues were present? Would you happen to know?\n<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

– Having a fundamental comprehension of economics will increase your ability to think in ways that are more well rounded. \nWhen you read any article regarding economic issues, you will be better able to comprehend and assess the writer’s point of view.\nWhen you hear school mates, work colleagues, or politicians talking about economics, you will be able to differentiate between common\nsense in economics and nonsense being passed off as economics. You will discover new approaches to thinking about current events and\nregarding personal and business decisions, as well as politics.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The field of economics doesn’t provide the answers, but it is able to light the path to various choices and opportunities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reading Time: <\/span> 10<\/span> minutes<\/span><\/span>THE GOALS OF LEARNING By the time we reach the end of this segment, you will acquire the ability to conversate about the significance of researching and studying the field of economics, examine and articulate the connection between production and the division of labor, and assess the impact of scarcity. Economics can be described as … Continue reading 2. Introduction to Microeconomics – What is Economics and Why is it Significant?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[97],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brief-guide-to-microeconomics"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3230"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3230\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3232,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3230\/revisions\/3232"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intelligenceanalyst.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}